Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ragan v. Forbes

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 22, 1924No. 1752-1756Published

1DissentAnderson, Circuit Judge

The questions involved in this ease are of importance, not only to the petitioner, but in their relation to the general scope and effect of our Bankruptcy Law (Comp. St. §§ 9585-9656). I cannot convince myself that the result is right.

Cheney’s trustee in bankruptcy contests the right of a creditor for more than $130,-000 to share in a bankrupt estate, which *788now, nearly seven years after adjudication, is in a position to pay a dividend of 75 to 90 per cent. The ease involves more than $100,000.

The questions presented should be considered in the light of certain general bankruptey principles.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Hutchinson v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. J. B. Orcutt Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Chatfield v. O'DwyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API