Legal Opinion

In Re Fink

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 15, 2007No. 16-12056PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON OBJECTION TO CLAIM

ROBERT E. GRANT, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter is before the court in connection with the trustee’s objection to a proof of claim filed by Janie Fink. The trustee argues that Ms. Fink’s claim was filed after the deadline for doing so had passed and so should be paid only after all timely claims have been paid in full. See, 11 U.S.C. §§ 502(b)(9), 726(a)(3). Ms. Fink argues that her claim, although admittedly belated, should be treated as timely because her formal proof of claim constitutes an amendment to an “informal proof of claim” which was filed before the bar…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. In the Matter of Pizza of Hawaii, Inc., Debtor. Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. v. Shakey's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Long v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re BrooksUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
  2. In re EganUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Harker v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA (In Re Krause)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
  4. In Re marchFirst, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  5. In re EnglandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API