Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Hemenway

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 2002No. 71772-9PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

— David Hemenway filed a personal restraint petition claiming that his plea of guilty was involuntary because he was not informed that mandatory community placement was a direct consequence of his plea. The Court of Appeals concluded that the petition was untimely under RCW 10.73.090 and dismissed pursuant to RAP 16.11(b). We affirm.

FACTS

On May 13, 1996, Mr. Hemenway pleaded guilty to first-degree child molestation. The offense, a class A felony, carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment and a $50,000 fine. Hemenway also faced a minimum of two years of community placement as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of StoudmireWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of StoudmireWashington Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re TurayWashington Supreme Court · 2003

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API