Legal Opinion
Collins v. Associated Pathologists, Ltd.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided February 11, 1987No. 84-1332PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, District Judge.
The Plaintiff filed this antitrust lawsuit, claiming that he was prevented from practicing pathology at the hospital where he had worked for eight years, because his membership in the group providing such services to the hospital had been terminated. The Plaintiff, Dr. James G.P. Collins, contends that the contractual arrangement between the Defendant Hospital, St. John’s Hospital, and the Defendant pathological group, Associated Pathologists, Ltd., is an exclusive dealing arrangement and an illegal tying agreement in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- James G.P. Collins v. Associated Pathologists, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Ginzburg v. Memorial Healthcare Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
- Miller v. Indiana HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Castelli v. Meadville Medical CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Illinois Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.