Legal Opinion
Illinois Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided January 16, 1990No. 84-1048PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MIHM, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an antitrust case. The Plaintiff, the State of Illinois, is suing in its proprietary capacity on behalf of certain state facilities, in its parens patriae capacity on behalf of all natural persons in the certified class below, and in its representative capacity on behalf of other indirect purchasers. This class was certified by the Court pursuant to Rule 23, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and described as follows:
All indirect purchasers of natural gas from Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (“PEPL”) who reside in or are located…
2Cases cited102 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ray Dancer, Inc. v. D M C Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Illinois ex rel. Burris v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- City of Chanute, Kan. v. Williams Natural Gas Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- State of Illinois v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Gilbert's Ethan Allen Gallery v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.