Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Southland Royalty Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 18, 1951No. 4794PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGILL, Justice.

By this suit appellees sought a declaratory judgment under Article 2524— 1, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., to settle and determine a controversy which 'had arisen between them and appellants as to their claim to a royalty interest in certain minerals produced from a portion of Section 6 in Block “A”, B. S. & F. Survey in Crockett County. They also sought an accounting and judgment against appellant, Humble Oil & Refining Company, the purchaser of the oil produced from such land. Trial to the court without a jury resulted in a judgment in favor of appellees for all relief sought, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Brown v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Grass v. Big Creek Development Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. French v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southland Royalty Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Dickerson v. RayIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Southland Royalty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API