Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELTON, Senior Judge.

Claimant Gordon Anderson petitions for review of the June 2, 1995 order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) McManus’ assessment of attorney fees against Employer Watkins Motor Lines in the amount of $1,995.00 as a “reasonable sum” pursuant to Section 440 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act).1 We affirm.

Issue

The sole issue before us for review is whether WCJ McManus erred in awarding Claimant attorney fees based on a quantum meruit analysis of the actual work performed by Claimant’s counsel instead of on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Eugenie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Elite Carpentry Contractors & General Accident Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Milton S. Hershey Medical Center v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Hendricks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Department of Public Welfare v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Nichols v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Ramsey Construction)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. B. Puricelli v. G. Kolbas and City of Phila. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API