Legal Opinion
United States National Bank v. Hill
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1970No. 26447PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Per curiam
The Petitioner is a national bank with its principal office and place of business in San Diego, California. The City of San Diego is located in the Southern District of California. The Petitioner and others were sued in the Central District of California, the claim against them being predicated, in part, upon the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (15 U.S.C. § 77v), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S. C. § 78aa).
After the filing of the complaint in the District Court, the Petitioner moved that the complaint against it be dismissed or, in the alternative, that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Buffum v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- American Surety Co. v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Leonardi v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Levin v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Harry Bechtel and Cathleen Bechtel, Husband and Wife v. Liberty National Bank, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Northside Iron and Metal Company, Inc. v. Dobson and Johnson, Inc., and the Third National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Michigan National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Fred Fisher v. The First National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Helco, Inc. v. First National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.