Legal Opinion

Protection Strategies, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 19, 2007No. 07-125 CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*227 OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

This post-award bid protest concerns.the procurement of Security System Services for the National Nuclear Security Administration’s (“NNSA”) Nevada Site Office and Nevada Test Site. Protection Strategies, Incorporated (“plaintiff’), an unsuccessful bidder, alleges that the NNSA improperly awarded the contract to a competing bidder who could not supply the required personnel as promised. Presently before the court are Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (“plaintiffs motion” or “PL’s Mot.”), Defendant’s Motion to Strike Certain Attachments to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fulcra Worldwide, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. L-3 Global Communications Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Metropolitan Van & Storage, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. CHE Consulting, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API