Legal Opinion
Labat-Anderson, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 29, 1999No. 94-218CPublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is a suit to recover bid preparation costs. Pending are the plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and the Government’s motion for summary judgment The matter was transferred to this judge on October 2, 1998. Oral argument was heard on November 20, 1998. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiffs motion is denied with respect to both counts I and II, and the Government’s motion is granted with respect to count II and denied with respect to count I.
*810FACTUAL BACKGROUND1
In 1987, the United States Agency for International Development (“AID”) launched the Black…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- E.W. Bliss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Statistica, Inc. v. Warren G. Christopher, Secretary of State, and the Orkand Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Banknote Corp. of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Femme Comp Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Dangfeng Shen Ho v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Orion International Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Worldtravelservice v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.