Legal Opinion

DeMeglio v. Auto Club Ins Ass'n

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1993No. Docket 147586PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from an order of the Oakland Circuit Court granting plaintiffs motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). Plaintiff cross appeals from the same order denying plaintiff interest and attorney fees. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Plaintiff, a minor, was injured when her bicycle was struck by an automobile. Plaintiff, a resident of Pennsylvania, was visiting her grandparents in Michigan at the time of the accident. Plaintiff received $10,000 in medical benefits under a no-fault policy issued to her parents under Pennsylvania law by State Farm Mutual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Jarosz v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Profit v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Tatum v. Government Employees InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. United Southern Assurance Co. v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Root v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. DeMeglio v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Durmishi v. National Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  4. DeMeglio v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API