Legal Opinion
Durmishi v. National Casualty Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 30, 2010No. Case 09-11061PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT WITNESS
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ernest Durmishi was injured in a motor vehicle accident and suffered serious injuries. He sued his insurance carrier, National Casualty Company, for first-party benefits under Michigan’s no-fault insurance law, Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.3101 et seq. His main claim is for the value of attendant care benefits furnished by his wife. The defendant…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coleman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- LOUGHERY v. MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Wilson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019