Legal Opinion

Amish v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1929No. Civil No. 2828PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

Guy Amish, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought this suit against the City of Phoenix, a municipal corporation, and Pacific Construction Company, a corporation, hereinafter called defendants, to enjoin the proposed improvement of Sheridan Street. The facts were stipulated in the lower court and a judgment was rendered there in favor of defendants, whereupon plaintiff brought the matter before us for review.

There are three assignments of error which raise three legal questions. The first is that the court erred in holding the protest against the improvement insufficient. It appears that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thurber v. McMinnvilleOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. City of Westport v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. People ex rel. Adams v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Buntman v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. People ex rel. Cuff v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Skelly Oil Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Sanderson Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. Moore v. Valley Garden CenterArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Collins v. City of PhœnixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  5. Granger v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API