Legal Opinion

Moore v. Valley Garden Center

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1947No. 5002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

The facts in this case aré not in dispute. By two deeds (dated November 23, 1934, and January 12, 1935, both properly recorded in the office of the Maricopa County Recorder) the City of Phoenix acquired property for park purposes which comprises a portion of the area now known as Encanto Park. About ten years later (December 12, 1946). the Parks, Playgrounds and Recreational Board of the City of Phoenix (a board of five members appointed by the Mayor and City Commissioners to control, regulate and develop the city’s parks) leased eleven lots and a tract in this area for 99…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City and County of Denver v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Williams v. . GallatinNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Spires v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Slavich v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. City of Wichita v. ClappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Raney v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Lilja v. County of WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. MacKinney v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Cleveland Botanical Garden v. Worthington DrewienOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Cleveland Botanical Garden v. Worthington DrewienOhio Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API