People ex rel. Cuff v. City of Oakland
California Supreme Court
APPEAL form a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. S. P. Hall, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
The purpose for which this action is prosecuted is to determine the validity of certain proceedings under which the defendant claims that certain territory lying between the northerly charter line of said city and the southerly line of the town of Berkeley has been annexed to it, and that said territory is now a part of said city. Findings were filed and judgment entered in favor of the defendant,, and the plain*600tiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
There is no controversy as to the facts. Nearly all were stipulated, and are incorporated in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Adams v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People ex rel. Connolly v. City of CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by15 opinions
- Weber v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Fragley v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- In Re Sanitary Bd. of E. Fruitvale Sanitary Dist.California Supreme Court · 1910
- City of New York v. Village of LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.