State v. Whitney
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
The State appeals from an order of the Cass County Court suppressing the results of an Intoxilyzer test given to Paul Whitney. Because we hold the State’s Dilger statement insufficient to confer jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal.
Paul Whitney was charged with driving while intoxicated in violation of North Dakota Century Code § 39-08-01. Upon Whitney’s motion, the Cass County court suppressed the results of his Intoxilyzer test on the ground that law enforcement personnel unreasonably hindered his attempt to attain a second blood alcohol test. 1
Pursuant to NDCC § 29-28-07(5),…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. KimballNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. DilgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. KisseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ShiptonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Fairgo v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KnowelsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Minot v. BjellandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Roseland v. HeraufNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. PollackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.