Legal Opinion

Fritts v. Wallace

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1987PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

The issue before the Court is whether a municipality may validly limit the issuance of permits to sell beer to regularly established grocery store[s], the majority of the gross sales of which are derived from the retail sale of groceries, and which store has been regularly established for twelve (12) months prior to the filing of an application for a beer permit.

We uphold the requirement that an applicant for a beer permit be a regularly established grocery store as reasonably related to the furtherance of the legitimate interest in protecting the public health, morals…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davidson County v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gatlinburg Beer Regulation Committee v. OgleTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Barnes v. City of DaytonTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Richards v. Lewisburg Alcoholic Beverage CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Watkins v. NaifehTennessee Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. Campbell County Board of EducationTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Neece v. City of Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  3. WRG Enterprises, Inc. v. CrowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cheyney McCarter, d/b/a USA Sports Grill, LLC v. City of Mt. JulietCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
  5. Dixon v. Lawrenceburg Beer BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API