Legal Opinion

Gatlinburg Beer Regulation Committee v. Ogle

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1947PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

This appeal comes from an order of the Circuit Judge wherein he held that a regulation of the Beer Committee of the incorporated town of Gratlinburg was illegal and void.

The Beer Committee refused to consider the application of the defendant in error for a permit to retail beer because he had not complied with a regulation of the committee, which required “the approval of at least two-thirds of all the property owners within a radius of 300 feet to accompany said application”.

Upon the refusal of the Beer Committee the defendant in error filed a petition for the common law writ of cer-tiorari…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conners v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Wright v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Anderson v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Board of Equalization v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Putnam County Beer Board v. SpeckTennessee Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Pérez Segovia v. Tribunal de Distrito de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
  2. Milgram Food Stores, Inc. v. KetchumSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Fentress County Beer Board v. CravensTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Ketner v. ClaboTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Case v. CarneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API