Legal Opinion
Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative v. Dept. of Energy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 5, 2009No. 05-75638, 05-75639, 06-73756, 06-74223, 06-74237, 06-74797, 06-75361PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
ORDER
The opinion filed on December 17, 2008, and published at 550 F.3d 846, is hereby amended as follows:
1. Slip Op. 16570, line 31: Replace <Eaeh of these justification> with <Each of these justifications >
2. Slip Op. 16571, line 4: Remove the sentences <This explanation is undercut, first of all, by the fact that the subsidized rates are supplied to just three firms, all of
which use electric power for the same industrial purpose — smelting aluminum. Thus, the payments do not encourage “diversified” use of electric power, but targeted use.>
3.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Joel White v. John Lambert, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sonya Renee v. Arne DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Alcoa, Inc. v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Association of Public Agency Customers v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Northwest Requirements Utilities v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.