Legal Opinion
Alcoa, Inc. v. Bonneville Power Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 16, 2012No. 10-70211, 10-70707, 10-70743, 10-70782, 10-70813, 10-70843PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge IKUTA; Concurrence by Judge TASHIMA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BEA.
OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated petitions for review challenge a contract between the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and one of its long-time customers, Alcoa Inc. BPA’s preference customers, as well as other entities and organizations in the Pacific Northwest, filed this petition for review, requesting that we hold that the contract is unlawful because it is inconsistent with the agency’s statutory mandate to act in accordance with sound business principles. They…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Shell Offshore, Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- The Arc of California v. Toby DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Where Do We Go Berkeley v. CaltransCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- protectmarriage.com - Yes on 8 v. Debra BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.