Legal Opinion
Association of Public Agency Customers v. Bonneville Power Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 28, 2013No. 11-73178PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge PAEZ; Dissent by Judge ALARCÓN.
OPINION
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
In this opinion, we consider whether a settlement agreement between the Bonneville Power Administration (“BPA”) and a large number of its customers is lawful. We invalidated a previous settlement between BPA and a class of customers because it did not comply with the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (“NWPA”). See Portland Gen. Elec. Co. v. BPA, 501 F.3d 1009, 1036-37 (9th Cir.2007) (“PGE”); Golden Nw. Aluminum, Inc. v. BPA, 501 F.3d 1037, 1048 (9th Cir.2007) (“Golden Nw.”). On remand, BPA…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Phigenix, Inc. v. Immunogen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Northwest Requirements Utilities v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.