Legal Opinion
Northwest Requirements Utilities v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 2015No. Nos. 13-70391, 13-70499, 13-70581, 13-72928PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Circuit Judge:
These are consolidated petitions for review of orders by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) that require the Bonneville Power Administration — a federal agency that both markets electricity and operates a large portion of the transmission grid in the Pacific Northwest — to provide transmission services on terms “not unduly discriminatory or preferential.” Bonneville has complied with the orders, and is not a party to this proceeding. The petitioners, instead, are wholesale electricity customers of Bonneville who challenge the orders on substantive…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sierra Club v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- National Family Farm Coalition v. UsepaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- City of Oakland v. Oakland RaidersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Multnomah Cnty., an Existing Cnty. Gov'T&a Body Politic & Corporate v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Blain v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.