Legal Opinion
Epley v. Hiller
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 15, 1954No. Civ. 8343PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARNS, J. pro tem. *
Appellant appeals from the judgment. The action was for the balance due on an open book account. Prior to the date of trial, the action was dismissed as to appellant’s codefendant, Bert Cann, due to his death, and a judgment from which this appeal is taken was rendered against the appellant, Stanley Hiller, individually.
Appellant and Bert Cann formed a partnership to take over and operate a mining property at Smartsville, in Yuba County, California, under the name of Rosebar Development Company. For use in their mining operations Cann made arrangements for the purchase of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Patten & Davies Lumber Co. v. McConvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Torvend v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Richards v. PlumbeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. JiorasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- National Farm Workers Service Center, Inc. v. M. Caratan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Credit Bureaus of Merced County, Inc. v. ShipmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Marsh Wall Products, Inc. v. Henry Marcus Building SpecialtiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Taylor Oil Co. v. GiordanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986