Legal Opinion
Torvend v. Patterson
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 1933No. Docket No. 4946PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
For some time prior to July 1, 1929, defendants J. D. Patterson and W. Witherly had been partners in the sheep business, under the firm name of Patterson & Witherly. During that period the partnership, in the firm name, purchased groceries from plaintiff for their sheep camps; certain groceries were also purchased by Witherly individually. The partnership carried a checking account with the Commercial Bank of Patterson in the name of Patterson & Witherly, out of which account, with cheeks signed “Patterson & Witherly, by W. Witherly”, plaintiff had been paid for groceries during a time prior…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Starr v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Hughes v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Buttrick v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- H. Albrecht & Co. v. MassingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
- R. C. Poage Milling Co. v. Joseph Howard & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Intagliata v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Finley v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Ehrhart v. BowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Credit Bureaus of Merced County, Inc. v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Epley v. HillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.