Legal Opinion

Richards v. Plumbe

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1953No. Civ. 15151PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, J. pro tem.

This appeal is taken from a judgment decreeing that appellants have no interest in an oil and gas lease on lands in Sacramento County; nor in the rentals which they yield. In addition to a declaration of their rights in the lease and the royalties appellants have also sued for an accounting for past collections and to restrain the payment of any monies collected under the lease to the respondent Plumbe. The action is founded upon an agreement of mutual undertaking made by appellants with Plumbe. The trial court found that this agreement had been annulled and abandoned by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Beck v. CagleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Patten & Davies Lumber Co. v. McConvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Golden State Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Aaron v. PuccinelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Epley v. HillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Wilkman v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Kirchnavy v. LevetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API