Legal Opinion
Wheeler v. Marathon Printing, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 25, 1998No. 9501-00698; CA A93256PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Defendants Marathon Printing, Inc. (Marathon) and Gary Wilkinson, plaintiffs employer and coemployee, appeal. They assert, inter alia, that the trial court erred in denying their directed verdict motions against plaintiffs claims for unlawful discrimination on the basis of a mental disability, ORS 659.425, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, and in denying their motions to dismiss plaintiffs punitive damage allegations on those claims as being impermissibly based on expression. Or Const, Art I, § 8; Wheeler v. Green, 286 Or 99, 117-19, 593 P2d 777 (1979). We reverse the judgment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Wheeler v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Patton v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Emily Snead v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company, a Delaware Corporation James McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Dawson v. Entek InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Norman Hutton v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc., a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Arnold v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Herbert v. Altimeter, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.