Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rudolph

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 11, 2018No. SC 20008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

**139*994This appeal requires us to determine whether there is a right to a jury trial in an action **140brought pursuant to General Statutes § 52-556,1 which waives sovereign immunity for claims arising from a state employee's negligent operation of a state owned motor vehicle. The named plaintiff, Anthony Smith,2 commenced this action, pursuant to § 52-556, against the defendant Department of Transportation,3 seeking damages stemming from an accident that occurred when a bus owned and operated by the state collided with a vehicle that the plaintiff was driving. After the plaintiff claimed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rivers v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Skinner v. AnglikerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Babes v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Cox v. AikenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Housatonic Railroad v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BemerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  2. State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  3. Feliciano v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  4. Lyme Land Conservation Trust, Inc. v. PlatnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  5. State v. BemerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API