Legal Opinion
Skinner v. Angliker
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 30, 1989No. 13504PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
Certification was granted in this case limited to the question: “Did the Appellate Court err in deciding that a discharged employee who initiated an action under Connecticut General Statutes Section 31-51q was not entitled to a trial by jury?” Skinner v. Angliker, 209 Conn. 807, 548 A.2d 438 (1989). We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court.
*372The facts relevant to this appeal have been set forth in the opinion of the Appellate Court; Skinner v. Angliker, 15 Conn. App. 297, 544 A.2d 246 (1988); but can be briefly summarized as follows. Shortly after being employed by the department of mental…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IVSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.