Legal Opinion
Halcomb v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-Arms
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 2, 2008No. Civil Action 01-1428 (RBW)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
Gloria Halcomb brought this lawsuit, pro se, against the Office of the SergeanWat-Arms of the United States Senate (“Ser-geanNab-Arms”) under the Congressional Accountability Act (“CAA” or “Act”), 2 U.S.C. §§ 1301-1438 (2000), asserting race and sex discrimination, and retaliation. 1 Amended Verified Complaint (“Am. Compl.”) ¶ 1. The defendant has moved to dismiss this case pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, asserting that the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, or, alternatively, for summary judgment…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Mary Chambers v. DC (EN BANC)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Manuel v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Brown v. MillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Herbert v. Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.