Legal Opinion

Brown v. Fritz

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1985No. 15311PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment which allowed damages for the negligent infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff-respondent Brown brought the action against the Fritzes, from whom she purchased real property, for misrepresentation of title, misrepresentation of the condition of the property, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Daniel Manning was also joined as a defendant, in order to clear title to the property in question. Following trial by jury, title was quieted in plaintiff and she was awarded damages, both for the misrepresentation of the condition of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hatfield v. Max Rouse & Sons NorthwestIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Higginson v. WestergardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Davis v. GageIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Hill v. Travelers InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Black Canyon Racquetball Club, Inc. v. Idaho First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Waddoups v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Curtis v. FirthIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Edmondson v. Shearer Lumber ProductsIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Suitts v. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API