Legal Opinion

Hill v. Travelers Insurance

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1927PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggaet

The declaration in this case was filed by Mrs. Mary Brown Hill against the Travelers Insurance Company and Dr. John A. McIntosh for damages for an unauthorized mutilation and exposure of the body of her deceased husband. The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment sustaining a demurrer filed to the declaration by both defendants.

The demurrer makes the defense that the declaration fails to state a cause of action against the defendants, and also interposes the statute of limitations of one year as a bar to the action.

The declaration contains a single count, and avers that plaintiff’s husband,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Larson v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Darcy v. . Presbyterian HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Wadsworth v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Koerber v. PatekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Wright v. Hollywood Cemetery CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Camper v. MinorTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Miller v. WillbanksTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hatfield v. Max Rouse & Sons NorthwestIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Sallee v. BarrettTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Johnson v. Woman's HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API