Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Moise Rodriguez v. Florida Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 7, 2014No. 12-10887Published

1ConcurrenceBaylson, District Judge

I concur in the result, but I decline to join the broad ruling of the majority, particularly requiring that, when an answer is filed to a habeas petition, all exhibits and items “referenced” in the answer, must always be served on the petitioner.

I agree with the majority that the factual record in this case requires a reversal. The district court should have required that the Florida Attorney General provide to petitioner a copy of the appendix to its answer. This is the correct result in this case, but not because the appendix to the answer had been filed with the district court. More…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Burt v. TitlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Lonchar v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Roland A. Thompson v. Kathleen Greene Attorney General for the State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API