Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 27, 1908PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Dallas District Gourt. — Hon. Edmund Nichols, Judge. Action involving plaintiff’s claim of dower in lands of which it is alleged her husband, James Sullivan, died seised. Decree for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

On October 1, 1893, James Sullivan, being the owner of several forty-acre tracts of land, including the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section 21, township 81, range 26, in Dallas County, united with his wife. Bridget Sullivan, in a conveyance of *680the last-described tract to their son, James Sullivan, Jr. The deed so given recites that, in consideration of" such conveyance, James Sullivan, Jr., undertook to pay to the grantors, and to the survivor of them, during life, the sum of $100 per year, and all taxes accruing on said property, and that he would not convey or incumber the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kusch v. KuschIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Talbott v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Thomas v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Barnes v. GaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  5. Bowman v. BesleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Baker v. SyfrittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Forte v. CarusoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. United States v. SchippersDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2013
  4. Tukey v. FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Eastman v. DefreesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API