Legal Opinion

Vitanza v. Iron City Produce Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1938No. Appeal, 220PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The question raised by this appeal is whether the claimant was disabled as the result of an accident as that term is used in the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The referee and board found that he was and the court below entered a judgment for the claimant on the award of the board for total disability for nine weeks and six days and for partial disability for the balance of the statutory period. We are all of the opinion that the question raised was one of fact for the board and that there was sufficient evidence to support the finding. Such being the case, we cannot disturb…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Witt v. Witt's Food Mkt. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. McFadden v. Lehigh Navigation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Betts v. American Stores Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Falls v. Tenn. Furn. Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Palermo v. North East Preserving Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Gavula v. Sims Company.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Landis v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Phelps Dodge Corporation v. DewittArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Fetrow v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API