Legal Opinion

Ames v. City of North Las Vegas

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1967No. 5366PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*511OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, C. J.:

This appeal is from an interlocutory order denying a preliminary injunction incident to an action for declaratory relief. The appeal is permissible. Vegas Franchises, Ltd. v. Culinary Workers, 83 Nev. 236, 427 P.2d 959 (1967).

John and Dorotha Ames, resident taxpayers, sought a judgment invalidating Ordinance No. 322 of the City of North Las Vegas. That ordinance creates a special assessment district for street, sidewalk, and storm sewer projects within the city *512and will be financed by the sale and issuance of public improvement bonds. Their claim for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Joplin v. Ten BrookOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. City of Venice v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. Penrose v. Whitacre Ex Rel. County of LyonNevada Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Carville v. McBrideNevada Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Vegas Franchises, Ltd. v. Culinary Wkrs. U., Loc. No. 226Nevada Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Application of MartinNevada Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API