Matter of Chavis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
These appeals were consolidated because they present a single question: where the record does not affirmatively show that the juvenile respondent voluntarily and knowingly admitted the allegations in the juvenile petition, did the court err in adjudicating the juvenile delinquent upon a finding, based on the admission, that the respondent committed the acts alleged in the petition.
Respondents correctly argue that juvenile delinquency hearings, pursuant to G.S. Chap. 7A, Article 23, place them in danger of confinement, and, therefore, the proceedings are to be treated as criminal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- In Re MeyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- In re T.E.F.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- Matter of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Matter of Kenyon N.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- In Re WHCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.