Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Gerald

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1927No. 5 Div. 979PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

Mandamus is the process to review interlocutory orders fixing temporary allowances of the wife in divorce suits.' Brady v. Brady, 144 Ala. 414, 39 So. 237; Ex parte Edwards, 183 Ala. 659, 62 So. 775; Ex parte Jackson, 212 Ala. 496, 103 So. 558; Ex parte Hilton, 213 Ala. 573, 105 So. 647; Rogers v. Rogers, 215 Ala. 259, 110 So. 141; Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280, 110 So. 409; Ex parte Tower Mfg. Co., 103 Ala. 415, 15 So. 836.

The petition of complainant shows, among other things, that there was a bill by the wife for divorce, and to represent her in that behalf she employed counsel who discharged…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pearson v. DarringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  2. Brady v. BradySupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  3. Ex parte Tower Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Dent v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fuqua v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Low v. LowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Carter v. Virginia Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. McNutt v. BeatySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Sue Davidson, P.C. v. NaranjoWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API