Legal Opinion

Bidwell v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 21, 1915PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from Mobile Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. Thomas H. Smith.. In the administration of the estate in the chancery court, on a controversy between Jennie H. Bidwell as executrix, and Howard, D. Johnson and others, there was a decree awarding counsel fees to be charged as cost of the administration, and from this decree the executrix appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellant, Jennie H. Bidwell, qualified as executrix of the last will of Rufus Dane, deceased, in the probate court of Mobile county. Inventory of the estate was dnly filed by her, and the same was duly appraised. More than three years thereafter, *196no final Settlement of her administration baying been bad, appellees, as some of tbe distributees of said estate, filed a motion in tbe probate court to require sucb final settlement to be made as a partial settlement only, as prayed by tbe executrix. It was ordered on the motion of appellees that tbe executrix be required to give bond. Subsequently…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. South & North Alabama Railroad v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Wilks v. WilksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Dent v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Bidwell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Penney v. Pritchard & McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API