Legal Opinion

Hanik v. Wilczynski

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1971No. 9340PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

33 Mich. App. 268 (1971)

189 N.W.2d 815

HANIK

v.

WILCZYNSKI

Docket No. 9340.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided April 28, 1971.

Calvin J. Klyman, for plaintiffs.

Condit, Denison, Devine, Porter & Bartush, for defendants.

Before: QUINN, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and McGREGOR, JJ.

2Per curiam

This is an automobile negligence case. The jury returned a verdict of no cause of action. Plaintiffs appeal, claiming that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence.

Since plaintiffs did not move for a new trial on that ground we cannot now order one. Armstrong v. Woodland Mutual Fire Insurance Company (1955), 342 Mich…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riber v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Schwartz v. TriffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Nadolski v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Armstrong v. Woodland Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Hanik v. WilczynskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cacavas v. BennettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Jones v. Sanilac County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Jones v. Sanilac County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API