Legal Opinion

Hanik v. Wilczynski

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1971No. Docket No. 9340PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an automobile negligence case. The jury returned a verdict of no cause of action. Plaintiffs appeal, claiming that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence.

Since plaintiffs did not move for a new trial on that ground we cannot now order one. Armstrong v. Woodland Mutual Fire Insurance Company (1955), 342 Mich 666; Nadolski v. Peters (1952), 332 Mich 182; Riber v. Morris (1937), 279 Mich 344.

Plaintiffs next argue that it was error for the trial judge to admit, over objection, an unsigned and unverified complaint filed in a previous personal injury action for the purpose…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riber v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Schwartz v. TriffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Nadolski v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Armstrong v. Woodland Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hanik v. WilczynskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API