Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Woodland Mutual Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1955No. Docket 47, Calendar 46,430PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

Plaintiffs Donald and Esther Armstrong were buying their home in Byron Center, Kent county, Michigan, on land contract. On July 31, 1948, defendant Woodland Mutual Fire Insurance Company issued to them a fire insurance policy insuring the home for $3,500 and its contents for $1,500. As members of a mutual company plaintiffs were required to pay annual assessments. In this regard the company’s bylaws which were part of the insurance contract provided:

“7. Assessments. All assessments shall be ordered by the board of directors, and shall be levied by the secretary and collected by the treasurer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riber v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Nadolski v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. B & M DIE CO. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Hanik v. WilczynskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Hanik v. WilczynskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Gobert v. City of WyomingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API