Legal Opinion

National Research & Development Corp. v. Varian Associates, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 4, 1995No. Civ. A. 89-2459 (HAA)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.

In 1989, plaintiff, the National Research and Development Corporation (“NRDC” or “plaintiff’) 1 , brought this action for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 3,999,188 (“’118 patent” or “Hoult patent”) against Varían Associates, Inc. (‘Varían” or “defendant”).

The Hoult patent discloses four claims. Claim 1 describes a nuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”) apparatus made up of speci- fled components including, among other things, a radio-frequency transmitter means for exciting a specimen by means of a train of radio-frequency pulses, successive ones which…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  5. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ABB Air Preheater, Inc. v. Regenerative Environmental Equipment Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API