Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Hawks

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1899No. 18,542PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Prom the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellant brought this action to enjoin the collection of that part of the cost of the construction of a sewer assessed against appellant’s property. Appellee Hawks filed a cross-complaint against appellant to recover said assessment and to foreclose the lien on said property. To this cross-complaint appellant filed an answer in two paragraphs, the second of which was a general denial. Appellee Hawks filed a demurrer for want of facts to the first paragraph of said answer, which was sustained by the court. Afterwards the appellant withdrew the second paragraph of the answer to said…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville Water Supply Co. v. RiterIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Matchett v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Hoosier Stone Co. v. McCainIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Board of Commissioners v. NicholsIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Seisler v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. NorcrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Tomlinson v. BainakaIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Sims v. Fletcher Savings & Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API