Dixie Belle Mills, Inc. v. Specialty MacHine Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
1. The defendant in error (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) filed suit against the plaintiff in error (hereinafter referred to as the defendant) in the Superior Court of Gordon County. The plaintiff’s action was one at law on an alleged implied contract, and the following statement presents, in condensed form, all that is material to an understanding of the question of our jurisdiction. The plaintiff’s petition alleged that the parties had entered into a contract to install certain equipment in the defendant’s plant; that certain additional equipment was needed to be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'Callaghan v. Bank of EastmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Harrell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Dunson v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Dyson v. Washington Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Gibbs v. H. T. Henning Company Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dixie Belle Mills, Inc. v. Specialty MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Sutker v. Pennsylvania InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Dixie Belle Mills, Inc. v. Specialty MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1961