Legal Opinion

Sutker v. Pennsylvania Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1966No. 42435PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

This action upon an insurance contract was amended by adding three counts seeking, inter alia, a reformation of the contract to include a coverage for loss sustained by the insured from the negligent act of an uninsured motorist. The petition, as thus amended, was dismissed upon general demurrer.

The amendment of the petition, seeking reformation of the contract, converted the action from one at law to one in equity, and hence the Supreme Court rather than the Court of Appeals, has jurisdiction of the appeal. Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV, Constitution of 1945 (Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Callaghan v. Bank of EastmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Benton v. BentonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. American Associated Companies, Inc. v. VaughanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Dixie Belle Mills, Inc. v. Specialty MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sutker v. Pennsylvania InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API