Legal Opinion
Dixie Belle Mills, Inc. v. Specialty MacHine Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 8, 1961No. 21236PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Presiding Justice.
1. Jurisdiction of the present case is in the Supreme Court, and not the Court of Appeals, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Frankum for that court. See Dixie Belle Mills v. Specialty Machine Co., 103 Ga. App. 478 (120 SE2d 54).
In its amendment seeking equitable relief, which was stricken by the court on oral motion in the nature of a general demurrer, the defendant prayed that the written contract be “reformed to comply with the oral understanding between the parties as to completion of the entire work,” and that, if it should be found that the contract…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Rivers v. Cole CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Dover v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Prince v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Early v. KentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Manley v. CombsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Kienel v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Adp-Financial Computer Services, Inc. v. The First National Bank of Cobb CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Thompson v. HechtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Souchak v. CloseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- American Food Purveyors, Inc. v. Lindsay Meats, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.