Legal Opinion
Leal v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 6, 1960No. 199-53PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLakamoRe, Judge
The plaintiffs claim that the contractor Leal (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff), in performing a contract with the Corps of Engineers of the War Department, encountered changed conditions within the scope of Article 4 of the contract, or in the alternative, that the defendant breached the contract by withholding from plaintiff information regarding ground water conditions, which changed conditions or withholding caused Leal to incur extra expense in performing the contract for which he should have been paid.
Plaintiff Mercantile National Bank of Dallas, Texas, is a *453party to this suit by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ragonese & Scaravelli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Shepherd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
- Blauner Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
- Ranieri v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United Contractors, a Co-Partnership Consisting of James E. Ward, Elkin Morris and Andrew J. Dickies v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- H. N. Bailey & Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- D. Federico Co., Inc. (Debtor) and U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. New Bedford Redevelopment AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.