Legal Opinion

Ragonese & Scaravelli v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 4, 1954No. 49364PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

On and after November 2, 1942, Frank P. Kagonese and Joseph V. Scaravelli were partners doing business as the Square Construction Company. The partnership will be hereafter referred to as .the Square Construction Company, and for the purposes of this opinion will be treated as an entity. It sues for excess costs incurred by reason of encountering quantities of underground water, in the construction of a sewer under a contract with the defendant, in an amount which it says it had no reason to expect.

Plaintiff says, first, that by reason of this it is entitled to an equitable adjustment under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Foster Construction C. A. And Williams Brothers Company, a Joint Venture, Etc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  3. United Contractors, a Co-Partnership Consisting of James E. Ward, Elkin Morris and Andrew J. Dickies v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. J.F. Shea Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API