State v. Louis
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
Dana Anthony Louis was convicted of armed robbery, in violation of secs. 943.32(l)(a) and (2), Stats. He appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion for a new trial. His assertions of trial court error focus on the jury-selection process.
The United States and Wisconsin constitutions guarantee a fair and impartial jury trial to every person charged with violating the criminal law. Hammill v. State, 89 Wis. 2d 404, 407, 278 N.W.2d 821, 822 (1979).
See also Rule 805.08(1), Stats. ("If a juror is not indifferent in the case, the juror shall be excused.")
Louis raises two issues that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Peters v. KiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LouisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. DelgadoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Carrington v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Carrington v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. LouisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990