Legal Opinion
Gulf Insurance v. Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss, Figler, Simon & Gladstone
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 17, 2000No. B128560PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, J. *
Gulf Insurance Company (Gulf) appeals from a summary judgment rendered against it on its complaint for legal malpractice and breach of contract against defendants Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss, Figler, Simon & Gladstone (Berger Kahn) and its named partner, Leon Gladstone (Gladstone) (collectively, Berger Kahn and Gladstone; referred to as Berger Kahn defendants). Gulf contends that the trial court erroneously concluded that it lacked standing to sue the Berger Kahn defendants and that it failed to present a triable issue of material fact with regard to causation. Since we…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Merritt v. Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- American Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Cassady v. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Long v. Century Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Clarendon National Insurance v. Insurance Co. of the WestDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.